typewar

 
 
6,063
players
have been asked
9,272,049
questions
We've now launched
Quests
 

Stats on the Character m

people get this character right
93.3%
of the time
this character has been seen
23,361
times
bayesian-adjusted average is
91.3%
right

Ruler Of This Character

See all crowns.

Top Players At Identifying This Character

player right total bayesian
swift 99.6% 708 96.4%
@sardonicyouth 98.4% 752 95.6%
electricboogaloo 99.6% 512 95.5%
mervil 99.7% 359 94.3%
cram 96.8% 684 94.0%
ellawren 96.5% 748 94.0%
veezay 98.7% 395 93.9%
larry 97.7% 475 93.8%
maybe 97.2% 532 93.7%
willbo 97.2% 502 93.5%

Easiest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface right total bayesian
Didot 99.8% 2,151 96.2%
Optima 99.6% 2,141 96.1%
Futura 99% 2,108 95.8%
Georgia 97.9% 2,237 95.3%
Bembo 96.9% 2,124 94.7%

Hardest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface right total bayesian
Roboto 53% 551 84.0%
Helvetica Neue 82.1% 2,798 86.4%
Arial 88.9% 2,279 90.5%
Verdana 88.9% 2,115 90.6%
Gill Sans 89.3% 2,100 90.8%

Easiest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair right total bayesian
Hoefler Text vs Optima 100% 129 96.7%
Optima vs Times New Roman 100% 128 96.7%
Palatino vs Tahoma 100% 128 96.7%
Garamond vs Verdana 100% 126 96.7%
Optima vs Palatino 100% 122 96.6%
Bembo vs Optima 100% 121 96.6%
Skia vs Times New Roman 100% 120 96.6%
Times New Roman vs Trebuchet MS 100% 120 96.6%
Didot vs Georgia 100% 119 96.6%
Garamond vs Tahoma 100% 118 96.6%

Hardest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair right total bayesian
Helvetica Neue vs Roboto 53% 551 59.1%
Arial vs Helvetica Neue 57.7% 241 68.0%
Tahoma vs Verdana 58.6% 133 73.2%
Garamond vs Hoefler Text 61.6% 112 76.2%
Lucida Grande vs Verdana 61.8% 102 77.1%
Gill Sans vs Tahoma 63.7% 102 78.0%
Lucida Grande vs Tahoma 63% 92 78.4%
Andale Mono vs Monaco 60.5% 76 78.8%
Gill Sans vs Lucida Grande 66.7% 96 79.9%
Gill Sans vs Trebuchet MS 69.8% 116 80.4%
 
Your score is
0
Level
1
Current streak
0
longest: None