typewar

Stats on the Character Q

Ruler Of This Character

See all crowns.

Top Players At Identifying This Character

player	right	total	bayesian
mervil	99.9%	672	98.9%
electricboogaloo	99.6%	837	98.8%
swift	99.2%	1,046	98.6%
@birkenfeld	99.7%	395	98.1%
@damanique	99.2%	528	98.0%
brandon	98.9%	536	97.7%
@figonni	98.7%	596	97.6%
astooge	100%	239	97.4%
Fru Damp	98.3%	582	97.2%
keleinikov	98.5%	463	97.2%

Easiest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Baskerville	93.2%	30,014	91.1%
Monaco	94.2%	12,938	90.6%
Didot	91.2%	60,899	90.5%
Andale Mono	94.9%	8,500	90.3%
Futura	90.8%	53,598	90.2%

Hardest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Times New Roman	82.5%	75,510	84.3%
Verdana	82.9%	68,945	84.7%
Helvetica Neue	83.9%	76,419	85.3%
Optima	87.5%	73,434	87.9%
Trebuchet MS	88%	19,767	88.6%

Easiest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Baskerville vs Futura	99.5%	2,666	96.7%
Baskerville vs Helvetica Neue	99.4%	2,603	96.6%
Futura vs Garamond	97.3%	5,128	96.0%
Baskerville vs Optima	98%	2,586	95.7%
Didot vs Futura	96.4%	6,663	95.5%
Baskerville vs Verdana	97.7%	2,621	95.5%
Arial vs Didot	98.8%	1,716	95.5%
Didot vs Gill Sans	96.6%	3,554	95.2%
Didot vs Trebuchet MS	98.5%	1,436	95.0%
Garamond vs Helvetica Neue	96%	5,084	95.0%

Hardest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Helvetica Neue vs Verdana	65.5%	10,982	68.5%
Garamond vs Times New Roman	62.7%	5,254	68.9%
Optima vs Times New Roman	75.4%	12,764	77.1%
Trebuchet MS vs Verdana	67.1%	1,357	79.8%
Didot vs Times New Roman	78.4%	8,386	80.3%
Arial vs Helvetica Neue	73.4%	2,212	80.6%
Gill Sans vs Verdana	76.9%	3,583	81.1%
Tahoma vs Verdana	55.4%	567	81.4%
Baskerville vs Garamond	76.1%	2,704	81.5%
Futura vs Helvetica Neue	80.2%	6,612	82.2%