typewar

Stats on the Character O

Ruler Of This Character

See all crowns.

Top Players At Identifying This Character

player	right	total	bayesian
electricboogaloo	99.7%	700	98.7%
mervil	98.5%	659	97.5%
astooge	100%	244	97.3%
swift	97.5%	974	96.8%
@figonni	97.6%	531	96.4%
brandon	97.5%	527	96.3%
torch511	98.1%	320	96.2%
smoke	98.4%	258	96.0%
@damanique	97.3%	479	96.0%
@birkenfeld	97.2%	433	95.8%

Easiest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Didot	91.4%	60,426	89.7%
Futura	90.1%	52,924	88.8%
Monaco	93.1%	12,775	88.4%
Andale Mono	94.6%	8,193	88.1%
Georgia	91%	14,581	87.9%

Hardest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Optima	80.4%	73,317	82.1%
Helvetica Neue	81.1%	75,888	82.5%
Verdana	81.1%	68,708	82.6%
Times New Roman	83.7%	75,745	84.4%
Garamond	84.5%	46,286	85.2%

Easiest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Didot vs Gill Sans	98.8%	3,594	95.9%
Didot vs Futura	97.4%	6,505	95.8%
Baskerville vs Futura	98.4%	2,593	94.9%
Arial vs Didot	99.5%	1,761	94.6%
Futura vs Times New Roman	95.8%	6,620	94.5%
Baskerville vs Helvetica Neue	97.6%	2,640	94.4%
Futura vs Garamond	96%	5,056	94.4%
Didot vs Helvetica Neue	95.3%	8,334	94.3%
Baskerville vs Verdana	97.4%	2,466	94.1%
Baskerville vs Gill Sans	97.2%	2,618	94.1%

Hardest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Helvetica Neue vs Verdana	53.4%	10,987	57.5%
Arial vs Helvetica Neue	47.7%	1,794	65.9%
Garamond vs Optima	62.3%	5,243	68.0%
Garamond vs Times New Roman	63%	5,212	68.5%
Futura vs Gill Sans	60.8%	3,486	68.9%
Arial vs Verdana	51.9%	1,624	69.1%
Optima vs Times New Roman	70.3%	12,877	72.1%
Baskerville vs Optima	65.5%	2,659	73.6%
Baskerville vs Times New Roman	67.2%	2,634	74.7%
Baskerville vs Garamond	67.4%	2,562	75.0%