typewar

Stats on the Character M

Ruler Of This Character

See all crowns.

Top Players At Identifying This Character

player	right	total	bayesian
electricboogaloo	99.9%	742	99.3%
@damanique	99.8%	503	98.9%
swift	99.1%	1,002	98.7%
mervil	99.2%	665	98.5%
astooge	100%	254	98.3%
brandon	98.9%	560	98.1%
smoke	99.4%	318	98.1%
bbctol	98.6%	632	97.9%
grazegraff	99.1%	334	97.9%
tenpougensui	100%	187	97.8%

Easiest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Didot	96.2%	60,499	94.6%
Futura	94.8%	53,738	93.6%
Georgia	97.8%	15,022	93.5%
Skia	98.8%	11,250	93.4%
Times New Roman	93.9%	75,812	93.2%

Hardest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Verdana	86.5%	69,032	87.9%
Helvetica Neue	87.1%	75,438	88.3%
Lucida Grande	86.8%	17,482	89.6%
Arial	88.3%	22,792	90.0%
Roboto	51%	482	90.6%

Easiest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Futura vs Times New Roman	99.3%	6,590	98.3%
Didot vs Gill Sans	99.3%	3,570	97.7%
Baskerville vs Futura	99.7%	2,613	97.6%
Gill Sans vs Times New Roman	99%	3,658	97.5%
Garamond vs Helvetica Neue	98.5%	5,258	97.5%
Didot vs Futura	98%	6,517	97.2%
Futura vs Garamond	98.1%	5,350	97.2%
Baskerville vs Verdana	99.1%	2,564	97.2%
Garamond vs Verdana	98%	5,237	97.1%
Times New Roman vs Verdana	97.5%	11,006	97.1%

Hardest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Helvetica Neue vs Verdana	62.1%	10,881	65.8%
Arial vs Helvetica Neue	50.8%	1,788	70.0%
Baskerville vs Times New Roman	67.3%	2,553	76.8%
Lucida Grande vs Verdana	57.1%	1,188	77.2%
Arial vs Lucida Grande	59.4%	1,175	78.3%
Arial vs Verdana	65.9%	1,740	78.5%
Gill Sans vs Verdana	72.6%	3,564	78.7%
Helvetica Neue vs Lucida Grande	67.8%	1,134	82.3%
Helvetica Neue vs Roboto	51%	482	83.0%
Garamond vs Times New Roman	81.1%	5,206	83.8%