typewar

Stats on the Character C

Ruler Of This Character

See all crowns.

Top Players At Identifying This Character

player	right	total	bayesian
electricboogaloo	99.9%	839	99.2%
mervil	100%	641	99.1%
swift	99.4%	1,013	98.9%
brandon	99.3%	536	98.3%
astooge	100%	267	98.1%
@damanique	99%	509	98.0%
bbctol	98.7%	638	97.9%
@blloyd	99.2%	375	97.9%
sherrme	98.4%	761	97.7%
@figonni	98.6%	574	97.7%

Easiest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Skia	97.6%	11,151	92.8%
Georgia	96.3%	14,581	92.7%
Courier New	96.7%	9,169	92.3%
Baskerville	92.9%	29,564	91.9%
Monaco	94.2%	12,719	91.9%

Hardest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Verdana	84.2%	68,798	86.2%
Helvetica Neue	88.5%	76,258	89.2%
Gill Sans	88.6%	36,428	89.6%
Optima	89.7%	73,140	90.0%
Roboto	62.6%	516	90.4%

Easiest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Futura vs Times New Roman	98.3%	6,578	97.4%
Baskerville vs Gill Sans	99.2%	2,610	97.1%
Gill Sans vs Times New Roman	98.6%	3,630	97.1%
Baskerville vs Helvetica Neue	99.2%	2,554	97.1%
Baskerville vs Futura	98.9%	2,692	96.9%
Didot vs Futura	97.7%	6,539	96.9%
Garamond vs Helvetica Neue	97.7%	5,291	96.8%
Baskerville vs Verdana	98.7%	2,558	96.7%
Arial vs Times New Roman	99.7%	1,692	96.7%
Arial vs Didot	99.5%	1,747	96.7%

Hardest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Gill Sans vs Verdana	65.2%	3,521	73.3%
Helvetica Neue vs Verdana	70.8%	10,784	73.4%
Futura vs Gill Sans	69.6%	3,593	76.4%
Lucida Grande vs Verdana	62%	1,070	79.9%
Baskerville vs Times New Roman	73.8%	2,609	80.7%
Didot vs Times New Roman	78.7%	8,314	80.8%
Optima vs Verdana	79.4%	11,063	81.0%
Garamond vs Times New Roman	77.8%	5,286	81.1%
Futura vs Verdana	78.8%	6,668	81.4%
Baskerville vs Didot	77.4%	2,587	83.1%